The Odd Couple

Justice and the Rule of Law

It was a good idea at the time

In the wake of the upheaval of the Ferguson decision, I thought it would be good to go back and look at the definitions of justice and the rule of law.  It seemed to me that refreshing my memory on these notions would help me put the case into perspective.  However, I was soon reminded that these concepts are attempts to define things that are not only asymmetrical but are also constantly changing.  Further, the intersection of the two don’t necessarily integrate like a glove fits a hand.

Surprised, but not pleasantly

The good news is that the review has helped me put the case into a framework I can grapple with, albeit not in the form I thought would emerge. Instead of rigid and clearly defined “rules” I came away with a more philosophical perspective.  The downside of that is that my practical side was left wanting.

History speaks

One quote jumped out during my research was taken from the Federalist Papers.  James Madison wrote: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.  In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

I’m no angel

This is quite the challenge, given that no men are “angels” as Madison asserts. And certainly what constitutes an angel can be debated ad nauseam as well. What was clearly on display in Ferguson was a challenge for the fallen angels involved to live up to a standard of morality.  As a citizen, Brown was expected to obey the officer’s commands.  As an agent of the government, Wilson was expected not to usurp the rights of Brown.  As we all know, things went horribly wrong.

Served but…..

www.eurweb.com

So what about Ferguson….was justice served? The rule of law prevailed as the grand jury system worked.  The evidence was methodically scrutinized and it did not generate an indictment of the officer. The morality of the times prevailed.  But did the system serve the needs of the community?  The perception of minority oppression by police remains, despite the process having produced a predictable outcome.  While this remains a formidable issue, in a larger sense, the protests of this tragedy transcended racial and minority misgivings and remind all Americans that our government must be "obliged to control itself".    

Assurances of control

Already the future of policing is likely to be impacted.  The President suggested funding body cameras for police officers so that video and audio recordings can be captured as they discharge their duties. While it seems that Madison's astute observation is being acknowledged, one wonders if this will ensure the equitable administration of justice or diminish the effectiveness of police.

Pandora was here

More questions than answers were generated which, I suppose, is the nature of law.  What is certain; however the future is uncertain.  History shows us that the legal system changes to meet the needs of the time.  What then, will the changes end up being in the wake of Ferguson?  Consider some definitions of Justice as you ponder:

Jus-tice (Noun)

1. The quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness;
2. Rightfulness or lawfulness, as of a claim or title; justness of ground or reason
3. The moral principle determining just conduct.
4. Conformity to this principle, as manifested in conduct; just conduct, dealing or treatment.
5. The administering of deserved punishment, reward
6. The maintenance of administration of what is just by law, as by judicial or other Judgment of persons or causes by judicial process

Gangs & School Violence

Trends show changes in gang influences that cannot be ignored

Application delta

When considering plans to address school violence, the influence of gangs cannot be overlooked. Their impact on students is palpable in the decisions they make and the people they associate with. Gangs utilize violence for a myriad of reasons, most of which is to further their goals.  Like anything else, change is constant and gang behavior evolves as well. Unfortunately, a disturbing transformation has been observed in the way gangs apply their brand of violence that should be noted by schools.

The gang expert

Richard Garland

When CSI developed their Sensible Solutions school safety and security program, they enlisted the help of experts from a variety of fields including academia and law enforcement.  One contributor had a very unique and invaluable experience that was brought to the table and incorporated into the programming of this protocol.  Richard Garland, was a notorious gang member in Philadelphia at the height of the gang problem.  As a result of his actions, he forfeited over 20 years of his life to incarceration.  The good news is that Garland has put that life behind him and has moved on in a very positive way.  CSI consulted extensively with him during the development of the Sensible Solutions concept.

In the trenches

Garland earned his master’s degree in social work and is currently a visiting instructor at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health - Center for Health Equity.  In his capacity there, he researches gang violence, how it can be understood and ultimately how it can be prevented. Garland spends a lot of time gathering data from gunshot victims who are in the hospital recovering from gang inflicted wounds.  He seeks to understand the impetus of each event and as he does this, he gains first hand intelligence about the movements and motivations of gang members.

A terrible turn

From recent observations, Garland noticed concerning changes in the way gangs administer violence.  One of the observations has been the willingness to utilize violence against previously taboo targets.  In his time as a gang member, Garland recalled how no one would go after someone’s mother or their children.  Now, this has changed.  There is now a willingness to do things that were once considered “off limits” by gangs.

Taking advantage

What may be driving this trend is another observation he has uncovered. Garland noted that gangs are increasingly utilizing younger kids to do the most violent acts. He has encountered several instances where money was given to a young teen to perform a “hit” on someone much older than themselves. The solicitor of the hits are often in their late 20’s or early 30’s. These older influencers know that young kids are easily swayed by their age and status. And because of their youth they are capable of extreme violence with little or no reflection about the consequences.

You see it every day now

This movement toward youth can be seen in relationships forming in schools. Now, it is common to see underclassmen associating with upperclassmen. Gangs have discovered that younger kids will do just about anything for recognition and status and that can be achieved by doing unspeakable things for their older influencers.

Public policy and public housing

Another trend noticed by Garland has been the migration of gang members. He sees one reason for this movement is the closing of public housing facilities. As a result, gang members are moving to rent districts that previously did not have the direct influence of gang members in their communities. This has caused an influx of drugs, prostitution and the associated violence to move into areas unaccustomed to this effect. For schools, it is widely understood that whatever is happening in the community is ultimately brought through their doors. Knowing that this is happening, confronting this change should be a concern for school administrators.

Tough situation

Another side effect of the migration of housing changes is the intermingling of rival gangs. When one housing complex closes, people are often moved into available housing in a rival’s area. This has created tremendous tension and for the children caught up in this situation, they often find their lives to be very transient and fraught with violence. Again, these experiences are brought into schools on a daily basis.

Stepping up and providing solutions

To say the least, Garland’s work is invaluable to the development of violence mitigation and prevention measures. His life experience ranges from one end of the spectrum to the other and that wisdom is now being utilized for the greater good. Garland’s contribution to the Sensible Solutions protocol will certainly help school districts understand the how’s and why’s of gang influences and ultimately help them keep their schools safe.

Threat Assessment

Schools need mechanism to capture what is obvious and what is obscure to be safe

Another name added to the list

John David LaDue of Waseca, Minnesota was recently added to the list of infamous names associated with school massacres.  Fortunately, LaDue did not kill anyone and did not even fire a shot but alas was charged with attempted murder in the first degree.  And had it not been for the watchful eye of a suspicious adult, the teen likely would have progressed a lot further in his detailed plot to commit horrible crimes.

Mixed Traits – Mixed Signals

Several accounts cited information about LaDue that suggested he fit the profile of someone who may be at risk for destructive behavior.  Those attributes includes an affinity for guns, a fan of violent movies and authors of dark subjects.  He was also routinely seen practicing hatchet throwing at a tree in his front yard.  But on the flip side, this 17 year old was a high school honor student, held a job, had friends and was allegedly close with his older sister.

Suspect memorialized his intentions

http://www.startribune.com/

Facts obtained from the police investigation revealed a very dark and dangerous person who appeared to be intent on pulling off another Columbine style attack.  He had guns and bombs in his room and more bombs and materiel in a storage facility.  Most damming was a 180 page diary that not only detailed his intentions which included killing his family and creating a fire as a diversion but also showed an affinity for the Columbine killers and even planned to strike on the same date (April 20th) as they did.  

Did the adults miss the signals?  

LaDue’s father who was interviewed in a local paper indicated he was dumbstruck by his son’s dark side.  He was very open about his parenting of his son and by his account, acted reasonably in his upbringing.  LaDue was a good student and did not get into trouble which led the elder LaDue to provide his son with some latitude.  He did claim to check his internet browsing but stopped short of searching his room. That being said, the school superintendent indicated that LaDue was not unknown to them and that people made lots of contact with him and they tried everything possible to build relationships with him.  This is sort of a cryptic comment and the context in which it was said was not exactly known but it does raise the specter that LaDue was known to administrators for nefarious reasons.

The Missing Piece

But for some incredible luck and a citizen willing to make the effort to report suspicious behavior, the ending of this story may have been tragically different.  Clearly, luck is not going to win the day all the time.  There needs to be something beyond metal detectors and locked doors for real school security to be comprehensive.  A critical piece of the solution may lie in the creation of well trained Threat Assessment teams.

A serious commitment to safety and security

A Threat Assessment team is designed to be that place where intelligence is gathered, plans are formulated and actions are initiated.  All of its efforts are designed to intercept violent actors and prevent them from carrying out plans of destruction and mayhem before they happen.  They are also there for providing the help that students and families need to overcome these tendencies.  Threat Assessment teams are different from Student Assistance Programs but share a similar structure in that they require a school district to buy into the concept, make teachers and staff available to participate, allow time for training and meetings and to ensure that they are a visible and active part of school functioning.

Not an impossible mission

A very big lesson learned from tragedies in the past was that there was a connectivity gap between adults, both at home and at the school, and their students.  The creation of an inclusive environment is a necessary element for safe schools and establishing connections is a critical component of that concept.  In addition to the ability to investigate and formulate action plans, the Threat Assessment team would need to ensure the link between adults and students so that signals and threats are captured, quantified and acted upon.

A Most Dangerous Game

Guest blogger and Personal Protection Expert Sam Rosenberg explains the rules of the Knockout Game and how you can win it.

The Set-Up

By now, you've likely heard of a phenomenon called the Knockout Game. The rules are quite simple.  A single member of a gang of juveniles blind-sides an unsuspecting passer-by with a sucker punch, the goal being to knock the victim unconscious in a single blow. Typically, these attacks occur from behind, or as the victim is distracted by other members of the gang.  No target seems to be off limits.  Pregnant women, children and the elderly have been included among the victims.  This most dangerous game has resulted in serious injury and more than one death.

To police and most people, knockout game attacks are random and unpredictable.  Yet, as with all human violence, it is neither random nor illogical—even if this logic is pathological.  To understand, predict, and prevent this manifestation of violence requires an understanding of predatory logic in general.

Human Predators

www.humanevents.com

Human predators are opportunists, who fundamentally prey on the conscience and goodness of decent people. They live in a world devoid of decency.  A world ruled, rather, by a perversion of the notion of respect.  To the predator, aggression and dominance equals respect, and respect is everything.

The predator’s notions of right and wrong are also corrupted: “if I can get away with it then it is ‘right’, if I can’t then it is ‘wrong’.  Further, the conscience that governs decent people is absent or thoroughly corrupted in predators.

Predator’s Weakness

Those who seek respect through aggression are in fact some of the biggest cowards, with the weakest psychology.  They never achieve respect, only fear. And when they run into someone who isn't afraid they collapse like a house of cards. This is why even the most desperate predator is careful in how they select their prey.   Because they know – deep down – that they can only succeed if the target is unable or unwilling to fight back.  They are fundamentally cowards lacking the confidence and resilience to challenge someone who could fight back.  For them to succeed, the attack MUST be one sided.

The Prey’s Strength

Imagine, if you will, encountering a wolf while walking in the woods.  It locks eyes in a hard stare.  The hair on its back stands up; it bars its teeth, and begins to snarl.  If the wolf attacks, would you be justified in saying afterwards “but I never saw it coming”?  The warning indicators of predatory humans are not quite as obvious…or are they?

Now, imagine you are walking down the street and you see a person or group that causes you to feel fear.  Are you not being warned?  Are your instincts not telling you to avoid that situation, just as it would tell you to back away from that wolf?

Trusting your hardwiring for survival

Fear is good.  It is a messenger that wakes you up and is not something you need to overcome in your life. It is simply an impulse to be understood.  But most people try, at all costs, to override this impulse, or they mistakenly believe that experiencing fear somehow means that they lack courage.  But intuition allows you to know, without knowing why, and when safety is at stake, intuition communicates through fear.

Denial, however, is the exact opposite.  Denial is seeing the facts, yet choosing to disregard them.  Denial could flat-out get you killed, and it will always leave you vulnerable.

Situational awareness 

Attention is the active embracing of your primal instincts.  It is something that must be cultivated.  It must be practiced, and done so consciously.  Pay attention to your environment and trust your instincts no matter what the person looks like, and no matter how your logical mind desires to interfere or make excuses.

Recognize that all violence is situational.  When you allow yourself to be preoccupied, particularly with technology, you shunt your senses to such a degree that your mind cannot do its job, and you create a situation of vulnerability, even if you wouldn't otherwise have been perceived as vulnerable by a predator.

Winning the game

As predators are inherently cowards, you don’t have to be bigger, stronger, faster, better to deter them, you just have to be willing and able.  Willingness comes from ability.  Train the body, the mind follows. To recap in 4 simple rules:

1. Accept, first and foremost, that there are predators out there who will prey mercilessly on those whom they perceive as vulnerable.
2. Your first objective is to cultivate situational awareness, and to trust your intuitive threat recognition software.
3. If you perceive threat, move.  Get off the “X”, as we say in protection terms.  Take decisive action to avoid the situation and remove yourself as a target of opportunity.
4. Training is invaluable as it tunes your awareness and makes you a less inviting target, but remember that there are no silver bullet techniques if you don’t follow rules 1 through 3 above.

Sam Rosenberg is an internationally recognized expert on personal and institutional security.  A former Marine officer and close protection specialist, he is the director of global protective services for CSI.  His Pittsburgh based company INPAX | Academy of Personal Protection, provides comprehensive training and consulting services for individuals, families, corporations, and schools nationwide.  Read Sam’s full article on the knockout game here.