Bent Minds

A criminal psychologist identifies traits of psychopathy and asserts some characteristics may be useful

Secret Looking Glass

One of the best skills an investigator can have is an innate ability to read people.  And what reading a person is exactly may be debatable.  Suffice to say, this ability affords some with being able to see through disguises or to unconsciously detect unseen clues about the true nature and motivations of people. Sure, some skills related to understanding the behaviors and intentions of people can be taught but when it comes to this so called sixth sense, it is truly a gift.

Advantage for the good

The investigator who can capture some hidden essence about a subject, whether it be a client, witness or suspect, gains an invaluable upper hand. With this feeling or intuition, the investigator realizes a great vision which allows for maneuverability when aptly applied.  The investigator is able to avoid pitfalls and dead ends and it may help with quickly finding the truth.

Advantage for the not-so-good

Interestingly, persons diagnosed with psychopathic tendencies may also possess the characteristics of someone who can effectually read people.  In a recent article about the work of Professor Robert Hare who is a criminal psychologist, he identifies a set of attributes psychopaths typically possess. One of which was the ability to be cunning and manipulative.

Tables turned

Dr Hare’s research indicates psychopaths somehow know what you’re feeling, but are unable to feel it themselves.  And because of this, psychopaths can understand what you’re thinking and can use you against yourself because they don’t care.  This begs the question: What does the investigator do when confronted with someone who is more cunning and manipulative than you?

Test yourself

According you Dr. Hare, you or someone you know could fall on the psychopathy spectrum.  The characteristics of a psychopath, as identified by Dr. Hare are listed below.  Score it 0 if it does not apply, 1 if it partially applies or 2 if it fully applies.

1. Glibness and superficial charm  

   

   http://jurisprudenceinquiry.blogspot.com/

2. Grandiose sense of self-worth 
3. Pathological lying
4. Cunning/manipulative 
5. Lack of remorse 
6. Emotional shallowness 
7. Callousness and lack of empathy 
8. Unwillingness to accept responsibility for actions 
9. A tendency to boredom 
10. A parasitic lifestyle 
11. A lack of realistic long-term goals 
12. Impulsivity 
13. Irresponsibility 
14. Lack of behavioral control 
15. Behavioral problems in early life 
16. Juvenile delinquency 
17. Criminal versatility 
18. A history of “revocation of conditional release” (i.e. broken parole)
19. Multiple marriages 
20. Promiscuous sexual behavior

According to Dr. Hare a “pure, prototypical psychopath would score 40. A score of 30 or more qualifies for a diagnosis of psychopath.”

Use it to your advantage

Dr. Hare goes on to assert that some psychopathic traits can be beneficial.   For example, being cunning and manipulative can certainly a desirable attribute, especially if you are a professional investigator.  But is being cunning and manipulative the same as having the ability to read people. From an intent perspective, both afford the ability to gain the upper hand. The difference lies in how the person being read suffers from the encounter.

Match of wits

Not every interviewee will be a game of high stakes chess like Clarice versus Hannibal in the Silence of the Lambs.  But, if Dr. Hare’s assertion is true and there is a spectrum of psycohpathy, then it would be incumbent upon the investigator to seek out these signs in the people they encounter.  While only a professional can label someone a psychopath, the astute person can certainly read the tea leaves and leverage that information to their advantage.  Is that psychotic or what?

Balancing Investigation While Imposing Corporate Will

Using a professional investigator reduces friction while strengthening corporate standing

Busted and Frayed

Have you ever been hauled in front of the principal?  Ever been pulled over by the cops? Ever been taken to task by a customer?  These are some common instances where you are confronted by an authority; a person or institution that can impose their will upon you.  And when that will is imposed, it can cause a pit in your stomach.  That pressure applied to your conscious tells you to think twice before doing that again.  

This is a desired effect of someone or an institution wanting to change your behavior.  It is not life threatening, but it certainly has an emotional and psychological impact.  More often than not, the experience is going to change your behavior.  

Will it or Won’t it

When faced with delicate issues, often internal and employee related, a business can use the imposition of its corporate will to effect positive change. Similar to being pulled over by a police officer for speeding, the impact stops the behavior and you are likely drive slower going forward, even when you get off with a warning.  But in a business setting, finding the right cop can be a difficult proposition.

If, for example, there is a concern by a business owner or department head that employee misdeeds are taking place, the objective would be to halt the behavior and fix it.  In a case involving employee theft, a common reaction is for the ranking supervisor to conduct the investigation.  That is not always the best way to go about resolving the problem.  The perception employees have of their supervisor’s authority to conduct an investigation of theft is diminished somewhat because the theft is being perpetrated right under their noses. Further, the supervisor may not be qualified or have the nerve to conduct such an investigation.  They are then perceived as someone who could not effectively impose the corporate will.  If they cannot impose a will, they may not be able to resolve the issue.  

Thoughtful Force

Image from http://www.idlies.com

Internal theft is an obvious issue where businesses could utilize an investigator to resolve the problem.  Consider the following: The issue is professionally investigated, and from the findings, corrective action is applied.  Importantly, the investigator is seen as someone who effectively imposes the corporate will.  And sometimes a deterring impact is more desirable for the health of your business than a referral to law enforcement or some other resolution that might demoralize and distract employees. Utilizing an investigator also reduces potential friction between management and employees. It helps deflect animosity by placing the act of imposing the will of the company on the investigator even though the investigator works for the company.  This subtle shift goes a long way to maintaining critical working relationships.  

Theft and Beyond

Opportunities for involving an investigator go beyond general theft issues. Consider use of investigators in the following circumstances:  

• Mediate employee disputes 
• Thwart office bullying    
• Redirect extramarital affairs that have their origins in the workforce and are causing disruptions 
• Mitigate threats of workplace violence 
• Control domestic disputes of employees spilling over into the workplace.
• Investigate sabotage, employee espionage and security violations  
• Conduct a variety of compliance audits 

As situations are evaluated, outcomes must be considered.  Deciding on utilizing an investigator could be wise if confronted with these scenarios:  

• Intervention by supervisors, management or directors may result in undesirable outcomes
• Important working relationships could deteriorate or be destroyed if the intervention is done internally
• The situation could trigger law enforcement intervention but you’d like to resolve it before it gets that far. 
• You don’t want to put your management staff in a situation that they are not equipped to handle.
• You don’t want your employees dismissed and your operation turned upside down but you want the behavior and culture to change.  

Professional investigators offer business thinkers the opportunity to retain control of the situation and resolution by extending their authority through them. This buffer can preserve the company’s relationship with their employees when tough love needs to be administered.